![]() ![]() If this is how you prefer to edit - they are all fine tools.įCP BROKE with the conventions of NLE workflow design because it’s primary architect (the same guy who single handedly invented Premiere) saw that the media landscape was changing - and believed there were going to be better ways to enhance and advance editing tools.įCP is direct database-driven magnetic assembly editing. NLEs first simply tried to virtualize the mechanical processes of the day to keep things “comfortable” for the people using them.ĪVID, Premiere, Final Cut (before X) and eventually Resolve - all followed this path and are all structurally alike. It came out of traditional film and early broadcast techniques. I essentially edited one way for the first 30 years. Having made my living editing for 40 years now, this is my take. ![]() I’m just saying that the original post was inaccurate and misleading in saying “Davinci is relatively more user-friendly, however, Final Cut Pro has more amazing edit features”. I’m not saying that FCP isn’t amazing, again, FCP is my NLE of choice for the reasons you highlighted. This is just a small selection of amazing edit features that I wish FCP had. It has great collaborative editing features. Resolve has scene cut detection which I’ve found valuable for some edit projects I’ve done. I love how you can add motion blur to footage if you shoot it at a high frame rate. FCP has some of the best noise removal I’ve used, better than FCPs. Similar idea with when I want to hide a jump cut with what FCP calls a “flow” transition, resolves version looks way better. For example if I want to slow footage down beyond 24 fps and I want what FCP calls “optical flow” I’ve found that resolves version always looks better. But resolve often does certain things better. ![]() Well I think maybe you’re moving the goal post with the word unique. Which one do you think is the better one? Please share your thoughts too If you would like to read my own thoughts about these aspects more detailedly, you can check out my comparison guide here. Final Cut Pro has a ton of more rendering power. ![]() Video Rendering: DaVinci Resolve allows you to “add to render queue” while you work.Audio Mixing: Final Cut Pro is more simplified than DaVinci, but this can greatly benefit the novice video editor.Color Correction: Both have amazingly large color-correction features, but DaVinci has more.Video Editing: Davinci is relatively more user-friendly, however, Final Cut Pro has more amazing editing tools.Technicals: DaVinci Resolve is more cost-efficient, but Final Cut Pro has long been a popular choice for many users.If you are not sure which one to go with here are some specs you need to consider first When it comes to choosing your go-to video editing system, Davinci Resolve and Final Cut Pro are the ones that come to my mind first. r/VideoEditing - for nonprofessional editors r/editors - great place to ask editing questions. While Avid is a good free tool for learning the industry standard. Sharing links or tutorials related to pirating footage or software will result in an immediate ban.īest Free Editing Software: DaVinci Resolve,ĭaVinci Resolve is the most robust free option. Please don't spam the sub with CS:GO / video game edits or tribute videos without making an effort to generate discussion about your work. Please share any insights concerning your project. We recommend these subs: /r/photoshop /r/writing /r/AdobeIllustrator Posts relating to writing, photoshop, or any non-film related editing will be removed. Feel free to post articles, tutorials, questions or videos that discuss or demonstrate the process of editing. This subreddit is for anyone interested in film or video editing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |